\n| CCF Decision No. 4 (2025)<\/a><\/td> | Accuracy and quality of data; Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a><\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Blue Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 3 (2025)<\/a><\/td> | Accuracy and quality of data; Purpose of the notice or data<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Green Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 2 (2025)<\/a><\/td> | Due process; Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Description of criminal activities<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 1 (2025)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data; Family matter; International interest and seriousness; Ne bis in idem<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice; Yellow Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 5 (2024)<\/a><\/td> | Family matter; International interest and seriousness; Accuracy and quality of data; Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a><\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 4 (2024)<\/a><\/td> | Accuracy and quality of data; Purpose of the notice or data<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | SMV<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 3 (2024)<\/a><\/td> | Article 3 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a>; Misuse of INTERPOL\u2019s channels<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | SLTD<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 2 (2024)<\/a><\/td> | Due process; Human rights; Description of criminal activities; Article 3 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a><\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 1 (2024)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data; Family matter; International interest and seriousness; Due process<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Blue Notice; Yellow Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 11 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Validity of proceedings; Cooperation of NCBs<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 10 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Ne bis in idem; Transfer of proceedings<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 9 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Application for revision; Ne bis in idem<\/td> | Conditions for revision met, Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 8 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Validity of an SMV registration<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | SMV<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 7 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Validity of proceedings; Retroactive application of criminal law; Continuous offence<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 6 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of a Green Notice<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Green Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 5 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Extradition; Refugee policy; Description of criminal activities; Due process<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 4 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data; Description of criminal activities; Political character<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 3 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Transfer of proceedings; Description of criminal activities<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 2 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Ne bis in idem; Extradition; Description of criminal activities<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 1 (2023)<\/a><\/td> | Extradition; Description of criminal activities<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 10 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (right to movement within a state); Trial in absentia<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 9 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Accuracy and quality of data; Political character; Private matter<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 8 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | International interest and seriousness; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Conditions for revision met, Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 7 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Accuracy and quality of data; International interest and seriousness<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 6 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (right to life); Ne bis in idem<\/td> | Conditions for revision met, Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 5 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (right to life, right to security in the event of sickness)<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 4 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | SLTD<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 3 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Private matter; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 2 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (right to life, right to security in the event of sickness); Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 1 (2019)<\/a><\/td> | Unfunded cheques<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 18 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Article 35 of the CCF Statute<\/a>; Private matter<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 17 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (right to life); Article 35 of the CCF Statute<\/a><\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 16 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data; Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 15 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (torture and mistreatments); Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Conditions for revision met, Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 14 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (torture and mistreatments); Political character<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 13 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Accuracy and quality of data; Due process and fair hearing; Political character<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 12 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Article 35 of the CCF Statute<\/a>; Political character<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 11 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Status of the person; Misuse of INTERPOL\u2019s channels<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Blue Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 10 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Political character; Status of the person; Misuse of INTERPOL\u2019s channels<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Blue Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 9 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Family matter<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Yellow Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 8 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (torture and mistreatments); Political character<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 7 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Asylum and refugee issues; Article 35 of the CCF Statute<\/a>; Political character<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 6 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Trial in absentia; Political and religious character<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 5 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data; Due process and fair hearing; Political character; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 4 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data; Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Political character; Private matter<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 3 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Purpose of the notice or data; Due process and fair hearing; Private matter; International interest and seriousness; Unfunded cheques<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 2 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Trial in absentia; Private matter; International interest and seriousness; Lack of action for extradition; Unfunded cheques<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 1 (2018)<\/a><\/td> | Political character; Description of criminal activities; Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 17 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Due process and fair hearing<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 16 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Family matter; Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice; Yellow Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 15 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Religious character<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Green Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 14 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Description of criminal activities; Political character; Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 13 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Political character; Private matter<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Diffusion<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 12 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Due process and fair hearing; Political character<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 11 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Accuracy and quality of data<\/td> | Conditions for revision met, Compliant<\/td> | Green Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 10 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Conditions for revisions not met, Compliant with update<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 9 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Ne bis in idem<\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 8 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Private matter<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 7 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Reexamination (replaced by Article 42 of the CCF Statute)<\/a><\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 6 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Reexamination (replaced by Article 42 of the CCF Statute)<\/a><\/td> | Compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 5 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Due process and fair hearing; Trial in absentia; Political character<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 4 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Private matter; Unfunded cheques<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 3 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Political character; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 2 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Political character; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Compliant with update<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n |
| CCF Decision No. 1 (2017)<\/a><\/td> | Judicial data; Due process and fair hearing; Lack of action for extradition<\/td> | Not compliant<\/td> | Red Notice<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"CCF Decision Excerpts DocumentTagsDecisionData type CCF Decision No. 4 (2025)Accuracy and quality of data; Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s ConstitutionCompliantBlue Notice CCF Decision No. 3 (2025)Accuracy and quality of data; Purpose of the notice or...","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":233393,"parent":224858,"menu_order":10,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230797","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/230797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230797"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/230797\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":233903,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/230797\/revisions\/233903"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/224858"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/233393"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}} |