{"id":231329,"date":"2026-06-22T13:47:14","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:47:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=231329"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:55:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:55:56","slug":"2025-3","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2025-3\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 3 (2025)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Accuracy and quality of data; Purpose of the notice or data
Decision:<\/strong> Compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Green Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission
Requests Chamber<\/h1>\n

Request concerning [the Applicant]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/[xxx]\/[xxx])<\/p>\n

[xxx]th session
[date]<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Teresa McHENRY, Chairperson
Susie ALEGRE,
Mohamed KAMARA,
Michel FORST,
Hamza ES-SAID,
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated during its [xxx]th session, on [date], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [date], Mr [the Applicant] (the Applicant) lodged a request for the deletion of the information concerning him registered in INTERPOL\u2019s files. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed the Applicant thereof on [date].<\/p>\n

2. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s case, the Commission consulted the INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB) of [Country 1], and the INTERPOL General Secretariat (IPSG) in accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a>, on the arguments set forth in the request.<\/p>\n

3. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the challenged data were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its [xxx]th session.<\/p>\n

4. Further to Article 35(3) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a>, restrictions were applied to certain information in the Decision.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Data Recorded in INTERPOL\u2019s Files<\/h2><\/div>
\n

5. The Applicant, a national of [Country 1], is the subject of a Green Notice issued on [date], at the request of the NCB of [Country 1] for \u2018DRUG(S), FORGERY, THEFT\u2019 with the status of possible threat and the purpose to warn about an individual who may be a possible threat to public security\/safety or may commit a criminal offence in another member country.<\/p>\n

6. The facts of the case state the following: \u2018[Country 1]. Del [date] Al [date]. Esta Persona Registra [xxx] Condenas En [Country 1], Las Que A Continuaci\u00f3n Se Detallan: [date] Condenado A Una Multa Econ\u00f3mica Por El Delito De Consumo De Drogas. [date] Condenado A [xxx] Dias De Prisi\u00f3n Por Infracci\u00f3n A La Ley De Propiedad Intelectual. [date] Condenado A Una Multa Econ\u00f3mica Por Infracci\u00f3n A La Ley De Propiedad Intelectual. [date] Condenado A [xxx] Dias De Prisi\u00f3n Por Infracci\u00f3n A La Ley De Propiedad Intelectual. [date] Condenada A Una Multa Econ\u00f3mica Por Infracci\u00f3n A La Ley De Propiedad Intelectual. [date] Condenado A [xxx] Dias De Prisi\u00f3n Por El Delito De Hurto. Interpol [Country 2] Con Fecha [date] Informa Que Se Encuentra Detenido Por El Delito De Robo.\u2019<\/p>\n

7. [RESTRICTED]<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Submissions<\/h2><\/div>
\n

8. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him, contending, in essence that there is a lack of proportionality between the impact of the data processed and the purpose for which they were processed, and that the Green Notice lacks purpose.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

9. The Commission considers the following applicable legal framework.<\/p>\n

9.1. Field of competence of the Commission:<\/div>\n