{"id":231997,"date":"2026-06-22T13:47:35","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:47:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=231997"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:55:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:55:56","slug":"2024-5","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2024-5\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 5 (2024)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Family matter; International interest and seriousness; Accuracy and quality of data; Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a>
Decision:<\/strong> Not compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Red Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission
Requests Chamber<\/h1>\n

Request concerning [the Applicant]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/[xxx]\/[xxx])<\/p>\n

[xxx]th session
[date]<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated during its [xxx]th session, on [date], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [date], [the Applicant] presented a request for access to the information concerning him, registered in INTERPOL\u2019s files. On [date], the Commission found the request admissible as per Rule 30 of its Operating Rules<\/a> and informed him.<\/p>\n

2. On [date], the Applicant lodged a request for the deletion of these information concerning in INTERPOL\u2019s files. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules, the request was found admissible and the Commission informed him thereof on [date].<\/p>\n

3. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s case, the Commission consulted the INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB) of [Country 1], and the INTERPOL General Secretariat, in accordance with Article 34 of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> on the arguments set forth in the request.<\/p>\n

4. After being authorized by the NCB source of data ([Country 1]), the Commission informed the Applicant on [date] that he is wanted through INTERPOL\u2019s channels at the request of the NCB of [Country 1], and provided the information described in paragraphs 06<\/a> and 07<\/a> below.<\/p>\n

5. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the challenged data were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its [xxx]th session.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Data Recorded in INTERPOL\u2019s Files<\/h2><\/div>
\n

6. The Applicant, a national of [Country 1], is the subject of a Red Notice issued on [date] at the request of the NCB of [Country 1] for \u2018dilapidating\u2019 on the basis of a court decision handed down on [date] by the Court of First Instance in [Country 1], sentencing him to six months of imprisonment.<\/p>\n

7. The facts of the case state the following: \u2018On [date], [the Applicant] of [Country 1] dilapidated money with which he was entrusted. In fact, [the Applicant] managed to misappropriate money and properties from the two plaintiffs in order to cause them damage. [xxx].\u2019<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Submissions<\/h2><\/div>
\n

8. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him, contending, in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) the criteria for the publication of the Red Notice are not met;<\/p>\n

b) there are serious inaccuracies in the Red Notice; and<\/p>\n

c) the proceedings do not respect the principles of fair trial.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

9. The Commission considers the following applicable legal framework.<\/p>\n

9.1. Field of competence of the Commission:<\/div>\n