{"id":232017,"date":"2026-06-22T13:48:05","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:48:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232017"},"modified":"2026-06-22T13:48:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:48:05","slug":"2023-10","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2023-10\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 10 (2023)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Ne bis in idem; Transfer of proceedings
Decision:<\/strong> Compliant with update
Data type:<\/strong> Diffusion<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission
Requests Chamber<\/h1>\n

Request concerning Aaa BBB<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/xxx)<\/p>\n

xxx session
[date]<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

xxx
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated during its xxx session, on [date], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [date], Mr Aaa BBB (the Applicant) presented a request for access to the information concerning him, registered in INTERPOL\u2019s files. On [date], the Commission found the request admissible as per Rule 30 of its Operating Rules<\/a> and informed the Applicant thereof. After being authorized by the INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB) source of data, the Commission informed the Applicant on [date] that he is wanted through INTERPOL\u2019s channels at the request of the NCB of CCC, and provided the information described in paragraphs 05<\/a> and 06<\/a> below.<\/p>\n

2. On [date], the Applicant lodged a request for the deletion of the aforementioned information concerning him. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30, the request was found admissible, and he was informed thereof on [date].<\/p>\n

3. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s case, the Commission consulted the NCBs of CCC (source country) and DDD (third country), in accordance with Article 34 of the Statute of the Commission<\/a>, on the arguments set forth in the request.<\/p>\n

4. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the challenged data were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its xxx session.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Data Recorded in INTERPOL\u2019s Files<\/h2><\/div>
\n

5. The Applicant, a national of DDD, is the subject of a Diffusion circulated for his arrest and extradition on [date] by the NCB of CCC for [\u2026] on the basis of an arrest warrant issued on [date] by [\u2026] CCC.<\/p>\n

6. The facts of the case state the following: [\u2026]<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Submissions<\/h2><\/div>
\n

7. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him, contending, in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) the Diffusion lacks purpose; and<\/p>\n

b) the proceedings do not respect the principle of ne bis in idem.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

8. The Commission considers the following applicable legal framework.<\/p>\n

8.1. Field of competence of the Commission:<\/div>\n