{"id":232027,"date":"2026-06-22T14:01:28","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T12:01:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232027"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:56:01","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:56:01","slug":"2019-4","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2019-4\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 4 (2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Purpose of the notice or data
Decision:<\/strong> Not compliant
Data type:<\/strong> SLTD<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

Request concerning [\u2026]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/ [\u2026])<\/p>\n

(107th session, 28 January to 1 February 2019)<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Vitalie PIRLOG, Chairperson
Leandro DESPOUY,
Petr GORODOV,
Sanna PALO,
Isaias TRINDADE,
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its 107th session, on [\u2026], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [\u2026], Mr [\u2026] (the Applicant) lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission). Following the submission of all the required documents, in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed the Applicant thereof on [\u2026].<\/p>\n

2. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s case, the Commission consulted the INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB) of [\u2026], in accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. Both the Applicant and the NCB of [\u2026] were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its 107th session.<\/p>\n

4. Further to Article 35(3) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a>, restrictions were applied to certain information of the Decision.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

5. The Applicant is a national of [\u2026]. [\u2026]<\/p>\n

6. The Applicant\u2019s passport [\u2026], issued by [\u2026] authorities, is recorded in the SLTD (Stolen and Lost Travel Documents) database as \u2018Revoked\u2019 since [\u2026] by the NCB of [\u2026].<\/p>\n

7. On [\u2026], while travelling, he was stopped at national airport in [\u2026] by the border police due to the registration of his passport in the INTERPOL\u2019s databases and his passport was seized.<\/p>\n

8. [\u2026]<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

9. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning his [\u2026] passport registered in INTERPOL\u2019s files, contending, in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) his passport was revoked without lawful justification;<\/p>\n

b) the case is of a predominantly political character;<\/p>\n

c) INTERPOL\u2019s channels are misused by [\u2026].<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

10. General provisions:<\/p>\n