{"id":232029,"date":"2026-06-22T14:00:22","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T12:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232029"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:56:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:56:00","slug":"2019-5","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2019-5\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 5 (2019)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (right to life, right to security in the event of sickness)
Decision:<\/strong> Not compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Red Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

Request concerning [\u2026]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/ [\u2026])<\/p>\n

(108th session, 15 to 19 April 2019)<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Vitalie PIRLOG, Chairperson
Petr GORODOV,
Sanna PALO,
Isaias TRINDADE,
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its 108th session, on [\u2026], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [\u2026], Mr [\u2026] (the Applicant) lodged a complaint addressed to the INTERPOL General Secretariat, subsequently transferred to the Commission on [\u2026]. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a> the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed the Applicant thereof on [\u2026].<\/p>\n

2. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s case, the Commission consulted the INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB) of [\u2026], in accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a>, on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. The Commission informed the Applicant on [\u2026] that he is wanted through INTERPOL\u2019s channels by [\u2026], for the charges of [\u2026] and provided the information described in paragraph 9<\/a> below.<\/p>\n

4. On [\u2026], the NCB of [\u2026] confirmed the validity of the proceedings and of the arrest warrant, and provided answers to the questions raised by the Commission.<\/p>\n

5. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the data challenged were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its 108th session and invited to provide any additional information they may find necessary for the study of the request.<\/p>\n

6. Further to Article 35(3) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a>, restrictions were applied to certain information in the Decision.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

7. The Applicant is a national of [\u2026].<\/p>\n

8. He is the subject of a Red Notice issued at the request of [\u2026] on the basis of an arrest warrant [\u2026]. A Red Notice was issued against the Applicant on the basis of this arrest warrant [\u2026].<\/p>\n

9. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the Notice, is the following: [\u2026].<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

10. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him, contending, in essence that:<\/p>\n