{"id":232041,"date":"2026-06-22T13:51:34","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:51:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232041"},"modified":"2026-06-23T19:08:28","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T17:08:28","slug":"2018-1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2018-1\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 1 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Political character; Description of criminal activities; Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Lack of action for extradition
Decision:<\/strong> Not compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Red Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission) \u2026<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its \u2026 session, on \u2026, delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On \u2026, the Applicant lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed him on \u2026.<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> (CCF Statute), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of Country A and INTERPOL General Secretariat (IPSG) were consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint. \u2026<\/p>\n

3. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the data challenged were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its \u2026 session.<\/p>\n

4. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s case, in accordance with Article 34(1)\/(2) of the CCF Statute, the NCB of Country B was consulted on arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

5. The Applicant is a national of Country A. On \u2026, he was appointed by order of \u2026 as President of the Bank X in Country A.<\/p>\n

6. He is the subject of a red notice issued at the request of the NCB of Country A, on the basis of a judicial decision issued on \u2026 by the jurisdiction of appeal of Country A.<\/p>\n

7. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the red notice, is the following: \u2018…\u2019<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

8. The Applicant requested access to the data processed in INTERPOL\u2019s files concerning him as well as its deletion.<\/p>\n

9. He contends in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) the prosecution lacks any evidentiary basis;<\/p>\n

b) the case is of a predominantly political character;<\/p>\n

c) his location is known to Country A\u2019s authorities;<\/p>\n

d) there are several procedural irregularities.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

10. Field of competence of the Commission:<\/p>\n