{"id":232050,"date":"2026-06-22T13:51:09","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:51:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232050"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:56:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:56:05","slug":"2018-5","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2018-5\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 5 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Purpose of the notice or data; Due process \/ Fair hearing; Political character; Lack of action for extradition
Decision:<\/strong> Compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Red Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission) \u2026<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its \u2026 session, on \u2026 delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On \u2026, the Applicant lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed him on \u2026.<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> (CCF Statute), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of Country A and INTERPOL General Secretariat (IPSG) were consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint. \u2026.<\/p>\n

3. The Commission informed the Applicant and the NCB of Country A that it should study this case during its \u2026 session.<\/p>\n

4. In accordance with Article 34(1)\/(2) of the CCF Statute, the NCB of Country B was consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

5. The Applicant is a national of Country A and Country C. From \u2026 until \u2026, he was head of a company. In \u2026, he was elected \u2026 at a local election in Country A for the opposition party of Mr Y, he remained as such until an unknown date. He is also a political \u2026.<\/p>\n

6. He is the subject of a diffusion to arrest sent by Country A for \u2018\u2026\u2019, on the basis of an arrest warrant issued on \u2026 by \u2026 in Country A.<\/p>\n

7. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the Diffusion, is the following: \u2018\u2026\u2019<\/p>\n

8. On \u2026, the Applicant was arrested in Country B based on the diffusion. On \u2026, he released on bail and had to fulfil weekly obligations. Country B\u2019s authorities received the request for extradition from Country A through Diplomatic channels.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

9. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him.<\/p>\n

10. He contends in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) there are some irregularities in the proceedings;<\/p>\n

b) the case is of a predominantly political character.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

11. General provisions:<\/p>\n