{"id":232058,"date":"2026-06-22T13:50:47","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:50:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232058"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:56:04","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:56:04","slug":"2018-9","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2018-9\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 9 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Family matter
Decision:<\/strong> Not compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Yellow Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

Request concerning
[\u2026]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/ [\u2026])<\/p>\n

(104th session, 24\u201327 April 2018)<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Vitalie PIRLOG, Chairperson
Leandro DESPOUY,
Petr GORODOV,
Sanna PALO,
Isaias TRINDADE,
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its 104th session, on [\u2026], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [\u2026], Ms [\u2026] (the Applicant) lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission concerning her son Mr [\u2026] (the Child). Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request concerning the Child was found admissible, and the Commission informed the Applicant thereof on [\u2026].<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> (CCF Statute), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of the [\u2026] was consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the data challenged were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its 104th session.<\/p>\n

4. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s and the Child\u2019s case, the Commission consulted the NCB of [\u2026], in accordance with Article 34(1)\/(2) of the CCF Statute, on arguments set forth in the complaint. The NCB [\u2026] came in support of the Applicant\u2019s request.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. The Child is an [\u2026]. He is the subject of a yellow notice issued at the request of the [\u2026], as a missing child for his location.<\/p>\n

2. The information related to the disappearance or discovery, as recorded in the yellow notice is the following: [\u2026]<\/p>\n

3. [\u2026]<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

4. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning the Child.<\/p>\n

5. She contends in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) there is no purpose for the publication of the yellow notice;<\/p>\n

b) the case is of a family\/private nature;<\/p>\n

c) the requirement of interest\/seriousness of the data for international police cooperation is not met.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

6. General provisions:<\/p>\n