{"id":232060,"date":"2026-06-22T13:50:47","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:50:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232060"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:56:04","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:56:04","slug":"2018-10","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2018-10\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 10 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Political character; Status of the person; Misuse of INTERPOL\u2019s channels
Decision:<\/strong> Not compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Blue Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

Request concerning
[\u2026]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/[\u2026])<\/p>\n

(104th session, 23 to 27 April 2018)<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Vitalie PIRLOG, Chairperson
Petr GORODOV,
Sanna PALO,
Isaias TRINDADE,
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its 104th session, on [\u2026], delivered the following Decision:<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [\u2026], Mr [\u2026] (the Applicant) lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed the Applicant thereof on [\u2026].<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> (CCF Statute), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of [\u2026] and INTERPOL General Secretariat (IPSG) were consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. The Commission informed the Applicant on [\u2026] that he is the subject of data processed through INTERPOL\u2019s channels by [\u2026], as described in paragraphs 6<\/a> to 8<\/a> below.<\/p>\n

4. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the data challenged were informed on [\u2026] of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its 104th session.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

5. The Applicant is a national of [\u2026]. He was the [\u2026], appointed by [\u2026] Regional State Administration.<\/p>\n

6. He is the subject of a blue notice request by [\u2026] as a suspect for his location and to obtain information, on offences of [\u2026].<\/p>\n

7. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the blue notice request, is the following: [\u2026].<\/p>\n

8. The additional facts of the case are the following: [\u2026].<\/p>\n

9. On [\u2026], a judicial decision was issued by the [\u2026] for the Applicant\u2019s arrest.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

10. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him.<\/p>\n

11. He contends in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) there are some irregularities in the proceedings;<\/p>\n

b) the suits are politically motivated;<\/p>\n

c) the prosecution lacks any evidentiary basis.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

12. General provisions:<\/p>\n