{"id":232074,"date":"2026-06-22T13:50:01","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:50:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232074"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:56:02","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:56:02","slug":"2018-17","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2018-17\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 17 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a> (right to life); Article 35 of the Statute<\/a> of the CCF \u2013 Access to files
Decision:<\/strong> Not compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Red Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

Request concerning [\u2026]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/ [\u2026])<\/p>\n

(106th session, 16\u201319 October 2018)<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Vitalie PIRLOG, Chairperson
Leandro DESPOUY,
Petr GORODOV,
Sanna PALO,
Isaias TRINDADE,
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its 106th session, on [\u2026], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [\u2026], Mr [\u2026] (the Applicant) lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission, requesting the deletion of the data concerning him registered in INTERPOL\u2019s files. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed the Applicant thereof on [\u2026].<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> (Statute), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of [\u2026] and INTERPOL General Secretariat (IPSG) were consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. On 30 July 2018, the NCB of [\u2026] confirmed the validity of the proceedings, transmitted documents and provided answers to the questions raised by the Commission.<\/p>\n

4. During the study of the Applicant\u2019s case, the Commission consulted the NCB of the [\u2026], in accordance with Article 34(2) of the CCF Statute, on specific arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

5. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the data challenged were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its 106th session.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

6. The Applicant is a national of [\u2026] and of the [\u2026].<\/p>\n

7. He is the subject of a red notice issued at the request of the NCB of [\u2026] for the charge of [\u2026], on the basis of a decision handed down on [\u2026] by the [\u2026], and for the charge of [\u2026] on the basis of an arrest warrant [\u2026] issued on [\u2026] by the [\u2026].<\/p>\n

8. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the red notice, is the following: [\u2026].<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

9. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him.<\/p>\n

10. He contends in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) the case is of a predominantly political character, and the related Red Notice is not compliant with Article 3 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n

b) his extradition to [\u2026] would violate his human rights protected under the European Convention of Human Rights<\/a> (ECHR) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/a> (UDHR), and the related Red Notice is not compliant with Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

11. Field of competence of the Commission:<\/p>\n