{"id":232076,"date":"2026-06-22T13:50:01","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:50:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232076"},"modified":"2026-06-23T20:09:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T18:09:16","slug":"2018-18","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2018-18\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 18 (2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Lawfulness \/ validity of proceedings; Article 35 of the Statute<\/a> of the CCF \u2013 Access to files; Private matter
Decision:<\/strong> Compliant
Data type:<\/strong> Diffusion<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

Request concerning [\u2026]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/ [\u2026])<\/p>\n

(106th session, 16\u201319 October 2018)<\/p>\n

[\u2026], withdrawing based on Article 2.1(d) of the Operating rules of the Commission<\/a>,<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

[\u2026],
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its 106th session, on [\u2026], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [\u2026], Mr [\u2026] (the Applicant) lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission requesting the deletion of the data concerning him registered in INTERPOL\u2019s files. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed the Applicant thereof on 14 June 2017.<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> (Statute), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of [\u2026] and INTERPOL General Secretariat (IPSG) were consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. The NCB of [\u2026] confirmed the validity of the proceedings and of the arrest warrant, and provided answers to the questions raised by the Commission.<\/p>\n

4. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the data challenged were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its 106th session.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

5. The Applicant is a national of [\u2026].<\/p>\n

6. He is the subject of a diffusion sent by the NCB of [\u2026] for the charge of \u2018[\u2026], on the basis of [\u2026].<\/p>\n

7. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the Diffusion, is the following: [\u2026].<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

8. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning him.<\/p>\n

9. He contends in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) the case is of a predominantly political character, and the related data is not compliant with Article 3 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a>;<\/p>\n

b) the proceedings do not respect the principles of due process and human rights, and the related data is not compliant with Article 2 of INTERPOL\u2019s Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

10. Field of competence of the Commission:<\/p>\n