{"id":232080,"date":"2026-06-22T13:52:43","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:52:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232080"},"modified":"2026-06-23T19:08:27","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T17:08:27","slug":"2017-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2017-2\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 2 (2017)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Political character; Lack of action for extradition
Decision:<\/strong> Compliant with update
Data type:<\/strong> Red Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission) \u2026.<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera, delivered the following Decision \u2026.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On \u2026 the Requesting Party (hereafter \u2018the RP\u2019) lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission. Following submission of all the required documents in accordance with Article 10 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed him on \u2026.<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with article 5(e,4) of the Rules on the Control of Information and Access to INTERPOL\u2019s files (RCI), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of Country A was consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. The Commission informed the RP on \u2026 that he is wanted through INTERPOL\u2019s channels by Country A, as described in paragraphs 5<\/a> and 6<\/a> below. The RP was also informed of the fact that the Commission should study his complaint during its \u2026 session and invited him to share any other information or document with the Commission before \u2026, which he did by a letter dated \u2026.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

4. The RP is a national of Country A and Country B. He has been residing in Country B, since \u2026.<\/p>\n

5. He is wanted by Country A for \u2026, on the basis of an arrest warrant issued on \u2026 by the judicial authorities of Country A.<\/p>\n

6. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the Diffusion, is the following: \u2018\u2026\u2019<\/p>\n

7. On…, the request for his extradition to Country A was denied by the authorities of Country B.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The RP\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

8. The RP requested access to the data concerning him, as well as its deletion.<\/p>\n

9. He contends in essence that<\/p>\n

1) the case is politically motivated;<\/p>\n

2) he would not receive a fair trial if extradited.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

10. General provisions:<\/p>\n