{"id":232110,"date":"2026-06-22T13:51:45","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:51:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=232110"},"modified":"2026-06-23T15:56:06","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T13:56:06","slug":"2017-17","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/en\/documents\/interpol\/commission-control-files\/decision-excerpts\/2017-17\/","title":{"rendered":"CCF Decision No. 17 (2017)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Tags:<\/strong> Due process and fair hearing
Decision:<\/strong> Compliant with update
Data type:<\/strong> Red Notice<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Decision of the Commission<\/h1>\n

Request concerning
[\u2026]<\/p>\n

(Ref. CCF\/ [\u2026])<\/p>\n

(102nd session, 24 to 27 October 2017)<\/p>\n

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL\u2019s Files (the Commission), sitting as the Requests Chamber, composed of:<\/p>\n

Vitalie PIRLOG, Chairperson
Leandro DESPOUY,
Petr GORODOV,
Sanna PALO,
Isaias TRINDADE,
Members,<\/p>\n

Having deliberated in camera during its 102nd session, on [\u2026], delivered the following Decision.<\/p>\n

Expand all<\/a> Collapse all<\/a><\/div>\n
\n
<\/span>

I. Procedure<\/h2><\/div>
\n

1. On [\u2026], [\u2026] (the Applicant) lodged a complaint addressed to the Commission. Following the submission of all the required documents in accordance with Rule 30 of the Operating Rules of the Commission<\/a>, the request was found admissible, and the Commission informed the applicant thereof on [\u2026].<\/p>\n

2. In accordance with Article 34(1) of the Statute of the Commission<\/a> (CCF Statute), the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL (NCB) of [\u2026] was consulted on the arguments set forth in the complaint.<\/p>\n

3. Both the Applicant and the NCB source of the data challenged were informed of the fact that the Commission would study the case during its 102nd session.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

II. Facts<\/h2><\/div>
\n

4. The Applicant is a national of [\u2026].<\/p>\n

5. She is the subject of a red notice issued at the request of the NCB of [\u2026] for [\u2026] on the basis of an arrest warrant issued on [\u2026] and a European arrest warrant issued on [\u2026] by the [\u2026].<\/p>\n

6. The summary of the facts, as recorded in the red notice, is the following: [\u2026]<\/p>\n

7. An extract of the red notice was published on INTERPOL\u2019s website.<\/p>\n

8. On [\u2026], the NCB of [\u2026] cancelled the Red Notice to replace it by a new one based on a new arrest warrant issued on [\u2026] and a new European Arrest Warrant issued on [\u2026] by the [\u2026].<\/p>\n

9. On [\u2026], the Extract of the Red Notice was removed from the INTERPOL public website when the NCB of [\u2026] cancelled the Red Notice to replace it by a new one.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

III. The Applicant\u2019s Request<\/h2><\/div>
\n

10. The Applicant requested the deletion of the data concerning her.<\/p>\n

11. She contends in essence that:<\/p>\n

a) the prosecution lacks any evidentiary basis<\/p>\n

b) the proceedings are not lawful and do not respect her human rights.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

<\/span>

IV. Applicable Legal Framework<\/h2><\/div>
\n

12. General provisions:<\/p>\n