{"id":222791,"date":"2022-04-12T14:15:09","date_gmt":"2022-04-12T12:15:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=222791"},"modified":"2025-01-28T16:15:29","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T15:15:29","slug":"par-mani","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/par-mani\/","title":{"rendered":"Par mani"},"content":{"rendered":"\"\"\r\n\r\n

Sveicu j\u016bs sav\u0101 tie\u0161saistes biroj\u0101!<\/p>\r\n

Mana iepaz\u012b\u0161an\u0101s ar Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesu s\u0101k\u0101s 2000. gadu s\u0101kum\u0101, stud\u0113jot Dj\u016bka Universit\u0101tes Transnacion\u0101lo ties\u012bbu instit\u016bt\u0101 \u017den\u0113vas Universit\u0101t\u0113. Atgrie\u017eoties Krievij\u0101, kur 20. gadsimta devi\u0146desmitajos gados ieguvu jurista diplomu, 2002. gad\u0101 es aizst\u0101v\u0113ju ties\u012bbu zin\u0101t\u0146u kandid\u0101ta disert\u0101ciju, p\u0113c tam veicu zin\u0101tniskos p\u0113t\u012bjumus un pasniedzu Eiropas Konvencijas ties\u012bbas sav\u0101 alma mater. T\u0101pat es str\u0101d\u0101ju par \u0161tata juristu Amerikas Advok\u0101tu asoci\u0101cijas tiesiskaj\u0101 iniciat\u012bv\u0101 Centr\u0101leiropas un Eir\u0101zijas valst\u012bm (ABA CEELI), bet v\u0113l\u0101k k\u013cuvu par ASV Valsts departamenta Re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s iniciat\u012bvas koordinatora vietnieku. P\u0113c tam, apg\u016bstot juridisk\u0101s prasmes Ratgersa Universit\u0101t\u0113 ASV, es atgriezos un vair\u0101kus gadus vad\u012bju NVO \u201cCentrs praktiskajai juristu sagatavo\u0161anai un cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbai\u201d, kur kop\u0161 2004. gada m\u0113s akt\u012bvi str\u0101d\u0101j\u0101m ar E\u017dTT.<\/p>\r\n

Kop\u0161 2010. gadu s\u0101kuma es sniedzu savus pakalpojumus tie\u0161saist\u0113 k\u0101 priv\u0101tprakses jurists, re\u0123istr\u0113ts Sanktp\u0113terburg\u0101. \u0160aj\u0101 laik\u0101 man bija gandar\u012bjums str\u0101d\u0101t ar klientiem no da\u017e\u0101d\u0101m Eiropas valst\u012bm un pasaules vair\u0101k nek\u0101 1200 liet\u0101s un sniegt konsult\u0101cijas par vair\u0101kiem t\u016bksto\u0161iem jaut\u0101jumu, kas saist\u012bti ar E\u017dTT. P\u0113d\u0113jos gados es papla\u0161in\u0101ju savu praksi, taj\u0101 iek\u013caujot lietas pret da\u017e\u0101d\u0101m valst\u012bm, individu\u0101lus pazi\u0146ojumus (s\u016bdz\u012bbas) ANO komitej\u0101m un piepras\u012bjumus Interpola failu kontroles komisijai.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/a>\r\n\r\n

\u0160eit ir da\u017ei piem\u0113ri manam darbam ar E\u017dTT.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

\r\n Izv\u0113rst visu<\/a>\r\n Sak\u013caut visu<\/a>\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n

\r\n\r\n
<\/span>

Lieta Kirillovas<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2016. gada 19. septembra spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iesniedz\u0113jas ties\u012bb\u0101m netrauc\u0113ti baud\u012bt \u012bpa\u0161umu, jo valsts iest\u0101des bija atguvu\u0161as vi\u0146as dz\u012bvokli. P\u0113c tiesved\u012bbas E\u017dTT dz\u012bvoklis iesniedz\u0113jai tika atdots atpaka\u013c<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113jas<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Kostjuchenko<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2019. gada 9. j\u016blija spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iesniedz\u0113jas ties\u012bb\u0101m uz taisn\u012bgu tiesu, kas tika p\u0101rk\u0101ptas, apstr\u012bdot vi\u0146as tiesne\u0161a pilnvaru izbeig\u0161anu.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113jas<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Nigmatullins<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2020. gada 4. febru\u0101ra spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina, ka iesniedz\u0113js tika pak\u013cauts sp\u012bdzin\u0101\u0161anai no policijas puses, un piesprieda vi\u0146am kompens\u0101ciju 39 700 \u20ac apm\u0113r\u0101.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Singlas<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2020. gada 19. maija spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bb\u0101m uz priv\u0101t\u0101s un \u0123imenes dz\u012bves neaizskaram\u012bbu, jo vi\u0146a uztur\u0113\u0161an\u0101s Krievij\u0101 tika atz\u012bta par nev\u0113lamu.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Bulgakova<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2020. gada 23. j\u016bnija spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina, ka tika p\u0101rk\u0101pta iesniedz\u0113ja v\u0101rda br\u012bv\u012bba, jo tika blo\u0137\u0113ta piek\u013cuve visai vi\u0146a vietnei, pamatojoties uz vienu aizliegtu materi\u0101lu, kas v\u0113l\u0101k tika iz\u0146emts, tom\u0113r piek\u013cuve vietnei t\u0101 ar\u012b netika atjaunota. Ar atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumiem \u0161aj\u0101 liet\u0101 iesp\u0113jams iepaz\u012bties \u0161eit<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Lapteva<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2021. gada 9. febru\u0101ra spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iesniedz\u0113ja br\u0101\u013ca ties\u012bb\u0101m uz dz\u012bv\u012bbu, kur\u0161 atrasts miris apcietin\u0101jum\u0101, k\u0101 ar\u012b izmekl\u0113\u0161anas neefektivit\u0101ti. \u0160aj\u0101 liet\u0101 es sagatavoju iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumus, kurus parakst\u012bja un iesniedza iesniedz\u0113ja p\u0101rst\u0101vis.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Gavrilovas un citu<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2021. gada 16. marta spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina, ka tika p\u0101rk\u0101ptas iesniedz\u0113ju ties\u012bbas netrauc\u0113ti baud\u012bt \u012bpa\u0161umu, jo valsts iest\u0101des bija atguvu\u0161as vi\u0146u zemesgabalus. Spriedums pieejams tikai fran\u010du valod\u0101; E\u017dTT pazi\u0146ojums presei \u2013 ang\u013cu valod\u0101<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Lazutkina<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2020. gada 4. febru\u0101ra spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iesniedz\u0113ja, advok\u0101ta, ties\u012bb\u0101m sakar\u0101 ar krat\u012b\u0161an\u0101m vi\u0146a m\u0101j\u0101s un biroj\u0101, \u012bstenot\u0101m atbilsto\u0161i likumam, kur\u0101 tr\u016bka procesu\u0101lo garantiju, kas aizsarg\u0101tu profesion\u0101lo nosl\u0113pumu.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Gyr\u013cana<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2019. gada 9. janv\u0101ra spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina, ka tika p\u0101rk\u0101ptas iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbas netrauc\u0113ti baud\u012bt \u012bpa\u0161umu, konfisc\u0113jot nedeklar\u0113tos 90 000 ASV dol\u0101ru, kuru likum\u012bg\u0101 izcelsme bija zin\u0101ma un nebija prettiesiska.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Malejeva<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2019. gada 4. decembra l\u0113mumu<\/a> E\u017dTT sv\u012btroja lietu no saraksta, jo p\u0113c s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101cijas atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bba atzina iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, kas izpaud\u0101s vi\u0146a apcietin\u0101juma apst\u0101k\u013cos, un pied\u0101v\u0101ja vi\u0146am 7 000 \u20ac kompens\u0101ciju.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta La\u0161un<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2021. gada 7. decembra spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina iesniedz\u0113jas nevain\u012bguma prezumpcijas p\u0101rk\u0101pumu.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113jas<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Skvorcova<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2014. gada 7. oktobra l\u0113mumu<\/a> E\u017dTT sv\u012btroja lietu no saraksta, jo p\u0113c s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101cijas atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bba atzina iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, kas izpaud\u0101s p\u0101rlieku ilg\u0101 un nepamatot\u0101 apcietin\u0101jum\u0101, un pied\u0101v\u0101ja vi\u0146am 7 000 \u20ac kompens\u0101ciju.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)
(sagatavots, izmantojot s\u016bdz\u012bbas veidlapu, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 l\u012bdz 2014. gadam)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Reihertas<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2022. gada 22. febru\u0101ra l\u0113mumu<\/a> E\u017dTT sv\u012btroja lietu no saraksta, pamatojoties uz to, ka Krievij\u0101 tika rad\u012bts jauns tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzeklis, ko iesniedz\u0113ja var\u0113ja izmantot, neraugoties uz to, ka tas tika ieviests p\u0113c vi\u0146as s\u016bdz\u012bbas iesnieg\u0161anas E\u017dTT.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113jas<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113jas<\/a>
(ang\u013cu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Neznahina<\/h2><\/div>
Ar 2023. gada 6. apr\u012b\u013ca spriedumu<\/a> E\u017dTT atzina p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iesniedz\u0113ja br\u012bv\u012bbu mierm\u012bl\u012bgi pulc\u0113ties, jo vi\u0146\u0161 tika uzskat\u012bts par dal\u012bbnieku \u017eurn\u0101lista atbalstam r\u012bkot\u0101 g\u0101jien\u0101, ko atzina par nelikum\u012bgu.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Nikolaeva<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta saist\u012bta ar ilgsto\u0161u tiesas nol\u0113muma, kas bija par labu iesniedz\u0113jam, neizpildi. E\u017dTT 2019. gada 28. janv\u0101r\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Sablinas<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta saist\u012bta ar ilgsto\u0161u vald\u012bbas pal\u012bdz\u012bbas nesnieg\u0161anu tiesas nol\u0113muma, kas bija par labu iesniedz\u0113jai, izpildei. E\u017dTT 2018. gada 23. febru\u0101r\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113jas<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Safonova<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta skar ties\u012bbu uz taisn\u012bgu tiesu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, kas rad\u0101s, izmantojot iesniedz\u0113ja liec\u012bbas pret vi\u0146u pa\u0161u, kas tika ieg\u016btas, nesniedzot vi\u0146am iesp\u0113ju izmantot aizst\u0101vja pal\u012bdz\u012bbu un neizskaidrojot vi\u0146am ties\u012bbas klus\u0113t. E\u017dTT 2020. gada 30. novembr\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(ang\u013cu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Pras\u012bbas par taisn\u012bgu kompens\u0101ciju<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Pras\u012bbas par taisn\u012bgu kompens\u0101ciju<\/a>
(ang\u013cu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Kuz\u0146ecova<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta skar ties\u012bbu uz taisn\u012bgu tiesu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo iesniedz\u0113ja liec\u012bbas pret sevi tika ieg\u016btas bez iesp\u0113jas vi\u0146am izmantot aizst\u0101vja pal\u012bdz\u012bbu. E\u017dTT 2020. gada 30. novembr\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\r\n

Rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi iesniedz\u0113ja<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Stupko<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta skar iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu netrauc\u0113ti baud\u012bt \u012bpa\u0161umu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, atce\u013cot gal\u012bgu tiesas nol\u0113mumu par labu vi\u0146am, izskatot pret\u0113j\u0101s puses atk\u0101rtotu s\u016bdz\u012bbu, kas iesniegta Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101jam p\u0113c termi\u0146a nokav\u0113\u0161anas un bez nor\u0101des uz b\u016btiskiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem, kas var\u0113tu pamatot \u0161o atcel\u0161anu. E\u017dTT 2018. gada 28. septembr\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Aleksandrova<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta skar ties\u012bbu netrauc\u0113ti baud\u012bt \u012bpa\u0161umu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo, esot nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma pirc\u0113jam, uz iesniedz\u0113ju tika p\u0101rlikts atbild\u012bbas slogs par valsts iest\u0101\u017eu pie\u013cautaj\u0101m k\u013c\u016bd\u0101m, ievadot nepatiesus datus valsts nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma re\u0123istr\u0101 un \u013caujot vair\u0101kk\u0101rt veikt dar\u012bjumus ar \u0161o \u012bpa\u0161umu v\u0113l pirms vi\u0146\u0161 to ieg\u0101d\u0101j\u0101s. E\u017dTT 2021. gada 4. oktobr\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta politisk\u0101s partijas \u201cVolya\u201d<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta skar p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, kas rad\u0101s faktiskas neiesp\u0113jam\u012bbas d\u0113\u013c aizst\u0101v\u0113ties pret aps\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101m ekstr\u0113mism\u0101, kas galu gal\u0101 noveda pie partijas likvid\u0101cijas. E\u017dTT 2021. gada 21. oktobr\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Sivceva<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta saist\u012bta ar tiesisk\u0101s noteikt\u012bbas principa p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, ko izrais\u012bja neparedzama noilguma termi\u0146a atjauno\u0161ana p\u0113c tam, kad Krievijas iest\u0101des pie\u0146\u0113ma likumu \u201cpar Krimas Republikas uz\u0146em\u0161anu Krievijas Feder\u0101cij\u0101\u201d, kas \u013c\u0101va t\u0101m celt pras\u012bbu pret iesniedz\u0113ju. Rezult\u0101t\u0101, apmierinot \u0161o pras\u012bbu, vi\u0146\u0161 zaud\u0113ja savu \u012bpa\u0161umu. E\u017dTT 2021. gada 15. decembr\u012b veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n

<\/span>

Lieta Me\u0146\u0161ikovs<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta skar iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo vi\u0146\u0161 tika ievietots met\u0101la b\u016br\u012b tiesas z\u0101l\u0113. E\u017dTT 2023. gada 2. mart\u0101 veica s\u016bdz\u012bbas komunik\u0101ciju atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbai<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\r\n<\/div><\/div>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Sveicu j\u016bs sav\u0101 tie\u0161saistes biroj\u0101! Mana iepaz\u012b\u0161an\u0101s ar Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesu s\u0101k\u0101s 2000. gadu s\u0101kum\u0101, stud\u0113jot Dj\u016bka Universit\u0101tes Transnacion\u0101lo ties\u012bbu instit\u016bt\u0101 \u017den\u0113vas Universit\u0101t\u0113. Atgrie\u017eoties Krievij\u0101, kur 20. gadsimta devi\u0146desmitajos gados ieguvu jurista diplomu, 2002....","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":208873,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222791","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222791"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222791\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222832,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222791\/revisions\/222832"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/208873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}