{"id":222791,"date":"2022-04-12T14:15:09","date_gmt":"2022-04-12T12:15:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/?page_id=222791"},"modified":"2026-06-05T19:04:43","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T17:04:43","slug":"par-mani","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/par-mani\/","title":{"rendered":"Par mani"},"content":{"rendered":"\"\"\n

Laipni l\u016bgti man\u0101 tie\u0161saistes biroj\u0101!<\/p>\n

Mana iepaz\u012b\u0161an\u0101s ar Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesu s\u0101k\u0101s, kad 2000. gadu s\u0101kum\u0101 stud\u0113ju Dj\u016bka Universit\u0101tes Transnacion\u0101lo ties\u012bbu instit\u016bt\u0101 \u017den\u0113vas Universit\u0101t\u0113. P\u0113c atgrie\u0161an\u0101s Krievij\u0101, kur 20. gadsimta devi\u0146desmitajos gados biju ieguvis jurista diplomu, 2002. gad\u0101 es ieguvu juridisko zin\u0101t\u0146u kandid\u0101ta gr\u0101du, bet v\u0113l\u0101k veicu zin\u0101tniskus p\u0113t\u012bjumus un sav\u0101 alma mater pasniedzu Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu konvencijas ties\u012bbas. T\u0101pat es str\u0101d\u0101ju par \u0161tata juristu Amerikas Advok\u0101tu asoci\u0101cijas Centr\u0101leiropas un Eir\u0101zijas valstu tiesisko iniciat\u012bvu programm\u0101 (ABA CEELI), bet v\u0113l\u0101k k\u013cuvu par ASV Valsts departamenta Re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s iniciat\u012bvas koordinatora vietnieku. P\u0113c juridisk\u0101s apm\u0101c\u012bbas Rutgersa Universit\u0101t\u0113 ASV es atgriezos un vair\u0101kus gadus vad\u012bju NVO \u201cKl\u012bnisk\u0101s juridisk\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas un cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bbas centrs\u201d, kur kop\u0161 2004. gada m\u0113s akt\u012bvi str\u0101d\u0101j\u0101m ar ECT.<\/p>\n

Kop\u0161 2010. gadu s\u0101kuma es tie\u0161saist\u0113 pied\u0101v\u0101ju savus pakalpojumus k\u0101 priv\u0101tprakses jurists, re\u0123istr\u0113ts Sanktp\u0113terburg\u0101. \u0160aj\u0101 laik\u0101 man bija iesp\u0113ja str\u0101d\u0101t ar klientiem no da\u017e\u0101d\u0101m Eiropas un cit\u0101m pasaules valst\u012bm vair\u0101k nek\u0101 1200 liet\u0101s un sniegt konsult\u0101cijas par vair\u0101kiem t\u016bksto\u0161iem ar ECT saist\u012btu jaut\u0101jumu. P\u0113d\u0113jos gados esmu papla\u0161in\u0101jis savu praksi, iek\u013caujot taj\u0101 lietas pret da\u017e\u0101d\u0101m valst\u012bm, individu\u0101las s\u016bdz\u012bbas ANO komitej\u0101m un piepras\u012bjumus Interpola lietu kontroles komisijai.<\/p>\n<\/a>\n

T\u0101l\u0101k sniegti da\u017ei mana darba ar ECT piem\u0113ri.<\/p>\n

Izv\u0113rst visu<\/a> Sak\u013caut visu<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\n
<\/span>

Kirillovas lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2016. gada 19. septembra spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113jas ties\u012bbu uz sava \u012bpa\u0161uma izmanto\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo valsts iest\u0101des vi\u0146ai at\u0146\u0113ma dz\u012bvokli. ECT tiesved\u012bbas rezult\u0101t\u0101 dz\u012bvoklis tika atdots iesniedz\u0113jai<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113jas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Kostju\u010denko lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2019. gada 9. j\u016blija spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113jas ties\u012bbu uz lietas taisn\u012bgu izskat\u012b\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu saist\u012bb\u0101 ar vi\u0146as tiesne\u0161a pilnvaru izbeig\u0161anas apstr\u012bd\u0113\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113jas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Nigmatullina lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2020. gada 4. febru\u0101ra spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina, ka policija iesniedz\u0113ju bija pak\u013c\u0101vusi sp\u012bdzin\u0101\u0161anai, un pie\u0161\u0137\u012bra vi\u0146am kompens\u0101ciju 39 700 euro apm\u0113r\u0101.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Singlas lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2020. gada 19. maija spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu uz priv\u0101t\u0101s un \u0123imenes dz\u012bves neaizskaram\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo vi\u0146a uztur\u0113\u0161an\u0101s Krievij\u0101 tika atz\u012bta par nev\u0113lamu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Bulgakova lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2020. gada 23. j\u016bnija spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113ja izteiksmes br\u012bv\u012bbas p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo piek\u013cuve visai vi\u0146a t\u012bmek\u013ca vietnei tika blo\u0137\u0113ta, pamatojoties uz vienu aizliegtu materi\u0101lu; v\u0113l\u0101k \u0161is materi\u0101ls tika dz\u0113sts, ta\u010du piek\u013cuve vietnei t\u0101 ar\u012b netika atjaunota. Ar atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumiem \u0161aj\u0101 liet\u0101 var iepaz\u012bties \u0161eit<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Lapteva lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2021. gada 9. febru\u0101ra spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina ties\u012bbu uz dz\u012bv\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz iesniedz\u0113ja br\u0101li, kur\u0161 tika atrasts miris apcietin\u0101jum\u0101, k\u0101 ar\u012b attiec\u012bg\u0101s izmekl\u0113\u0161anas neefektivit\u0101ti. \u0160aj\u0101 liet\u0101 es sagatavoju iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumus, kurus parakst\u012bja un iesniedza iesniedz\u0113ja p\u0101rst\u0101vis.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Gavrilovas un citu lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2021. gada 16. marta spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113ju ties\u012bbu uz sava \u012bpa\u0161uma izmanto\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu vi\u0146u zemesgabalu at\u0146em\u0161anas rezult\u0101t\u0101. Spriedums pieejams tikai fran\u010du valod\u0101; ECT pazi\u0146ojums presei \u2013 ang\u013cu valod\u0101<\/a>.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Lazutkina lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2020. gada 4. febru\u0101ra spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113ja, advok\u0101ta, ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu saist\u012bb\u0101 ar krat\u012b\u0161an\u0101m vi\u0146a m\u0101j\u0101s un biroj\u0101, kas tika veiktas saska\u0146\u0101 ar likumu, kur\u0101 nebija procesu\u0101lo garantiju, kas nov\u0113rstu iejauk\u0161anos profesion\u0101laj\u0101 nosl\u0113pum\u0101.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Gyr\u013cana lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2019. gada 9. janv\u0101ra spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu uz sava \u012bpa\u0161uma izmanto\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu nedeklar\u0113tu 90 000 ASV dol\u0101ru konfisk\u0101cijas d\u0113\u013c; \u0161o l\u012bdzek\u013cu izcelsme bija zin\u0101ma un nebija nelikum\u012bga.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Malejeva lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2019. gada 4. decembra l\u0113mum\u0101<\/a> ECT sv\u012btroja lietu no izskat\u0101mo lietu saraksta, jo p\u0113c tam, kad ECT inform\u0113ja atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu, vald\u012bba atzina iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu vi\u0146a apcietin\u0101juma apst\u0101k\u013cu d\u0113\u013c un pied\u0101v\u0101ja vi\u0146am izmaks\u0101t kompens\u0101ciju 7 000 euro apm\u0113r\u0101.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

La\u0161unas lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2021. gada 7. decembra spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113jas nevain\u012bguma prezumpcijas p\u0101rk\u0101pumu.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113jas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Skvorcova lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2014. gada 7. oktobra l\u0113mum\u0101<\/a> ECT sv\u012btroja lietu no izskat\u0101mo lietu saraksta, jo p\u0113c tam, kad ECT inform\u0113ja atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu, vald\u012bba atzina iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu p\u0101rm\u0113r\u012bgas un nepamatotas tur\u0113\u0161anas apcietin\u0101jum\u0101 d\u0113\u013c un pied\u0101v\u0101ja vi\u0146am izmaks\u0101t kompens\u0101ciju 7 000 euro apm\u0113r\u0101.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)
(sagatavots, izmantojot s\u016bdz\u012bbas veidlapu, kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 l\u012bdz 2014. gadam)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Reihertas lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2022. gada 22. febru\u0101ra l\u0113mum\u0101<\/a> ECT sv\u012btroja lietu no izskat\u0101mo lietu saraksta, pamatojoties uz to, ka Krievij\u0101 bija izveidots jauns tiesisk\u0101s aizsardz\u012bbas l\u012bdzeklis, kuru iesniedz\u0113ja var\u0113ja izmantot, lai gan tas tika izveidots p\u0113c tam, kad vi\u0146a bija iesniegusi s\u016bdz\u012bbu ECT.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113jas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113jas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(ang\u013cu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Neznahina lieta<\/h2><\/div>
2023. gada 6. apr\u012b\u013ca spriedum\u0101<\/a> ECT atzina iesniedz\u0113ja mierm\u012bl\u012bgas pulc\u0113\u0161an\u0101s br\u012bv\u012bbas p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo vi\u0146u atzina par dal\u012bbnieku \u017eurn\u0101lista atbalstam r\u012bkot\u0101 g\u0101jien\u0101, kas bija pasludin\u0101ts par nelikum\u012bgu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Nikolajeva lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz ilgsto\u0161u iesniedz\u0113jam labv\u0113l\u012bga tiesas nol\u0113muma neizpildi. ECT 2019. gada 28. janv\u0101r\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Sablinas lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz valsts iest\u0101\u017eu ilgsto\u0161u pal\u012bdz\u012bbas nesnieg\u0161anu iesniedz\u0113jai labv\u0113l\u012bga tiesas nol\u0113muma izpild\u0113. ECT 2018. gada 23. febru\u0101r\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113jas rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Safonova lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz ties\u012bbu uz lietas taisn\u012bgu izskat\u012b\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo pret iesniedz\u0113ju pa\u0161u tika izmantotas vi\u0146a liec\u012bbas, kas bija ieg\u016btas, nedodot vi\u0146am iesp\u0113ju izmantot aizst\u0101vja pal\u012bdz\u012bbu un neizskaidrojot vi\u0146am ties\u012bbas klus\u0113t. ECT 2020. gada 30. novembr\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(ang\u013cu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Pras\u012bjumi par taisn\u012bgu atl\u012bdz\u012bbu<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Pras\u012bjumi par taisn\u012bgu atl\u012bdz\u012bbu<\/a>
(ang\u013cu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Kuz\u0146ecova lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz ties\u012bbu uz lietas taisn\u012bgu izskat\u012b\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo pret iesniedz\u0113ju tika izmantotas vi\u0146a liec\u012bbas, kas bija ieg\u016btas, nedodot vi\u0146am iesp\u0113ju izmantot aizst\u0101vja pal\u012bdz\u012bbu. ECT 2020. gada 30. novembr\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)<\/p>\n

Iesniedz\u0113ja rakstveida apsv\u0113rumi<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Stupko lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu uz sava \u012bpa\u0161uma izmanto\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, kas rad\u0101s, atce\u013cot gal\u012bgu tiesas nol\u0113mumu vi\u0146a lab\u0101 p\u0113c atbild\u0113t\u0101ja atk\u0101rtotas, Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101jam adres\u0113tas s\u016bdz\u012bbas apmierin\u0101\u0161anas; t\u0101 bija iesniegta p\u0113c termi\u0146a nokav\u0113\u0161anas un taj\u0101 nebija nor\u0101d\u012bti fundament\u0101li p\u0101rk\u0101pumi, kas var\u0113tu attaisnot \u0161\u0101du atcel\u0161anu. ECT 2018. gada 28. septembr\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Aleksandrova lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz ties\u012bbu uz sava \u012bpa\u0161uma izmanto\u0161anu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo iesniedz\u0113jam k\u0101 nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma ieguv\u0113jam tika uzlikta atbild\u012bba par valsts iest\u0101\u017eu k\u013c\u016bd\u0101m: t\u0101s bija pie\u013c\u0101vu\u0161as nepatiesu zi\u0146u ierakst\u012b\u0161anu valsts nekustam\u0101 \u012bpa\u0161uma re\u0123istr\u0101 un vair\u0101ku dar\u012bjumu ar \u0161o nekustamo \u012bpa\u0161umu valsts re\u0123istr\u0101ciju v\u0113l pirms iesniedz\u0113js to bija ieg\u0101d\u0101jies. ECT 2021. gada 4. oktobr\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Politisk\u0101s partijas \u201cVolya\u201d lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem, kas rad\u0101s t\u0101p\u0113c, ka faktiski nebija iesp\u0113jams aizst\u0101v\u0113ties pret aps\u016bdz\u012bb\u0101m ekstr\u0113mism\u0101; galu gal\u0101 tas noveda pie partijas likvid\u0101cijas. ECT 2021. gada 21. oktobr\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Sivceva lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz tiesisk\u0101s noteikt\u012bbas principa p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, ko izrais\u012bja neparedzama noilguma termi\u0146a tec\u0113juma atjauno\u0161ana p\u0113c tam, kad Krievijas iest\u0101des pie\u0146\u0113ma likumu \u201cpar Krimas Republikas uz\u0146em\u0161anu Krievijas Feder\u0101cij\u0101\u201d; tas \u013c\u0101va t\u0101m celt pras\u012bbu pret iesniedz\u0113ju, un p\u0113c \u0161\u012bs pras\u012bbas apmierin\u0101\u0161anas vi\u0146\u0161 zaud\u0113ja savu \u012bpa\u0161umu. ECT 2021. gada 15. decembr\u012b inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n

<\/span>

Me\u0146\u0161ikova lieta<\/h2><\/div>
Lieta attiecas uz iesniedz\u0113ja ties\u012bbu p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, jo vi\u0146\u0161 tiesas z\u0101l\u0113 tika ievietots met\u0101la b\u016br\u012b. ECT 2023. gada 2. mart\u0101 inform\u0113ja<\/a> atbild\u0113t\u0101jvalsts vald\u012bbu par s\u016bdz\u012bbu.<\/p>\n

S\u016bdz\u012bba<\/a>
(krievu valod\u0101)\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Laipni l\u016bgti man\u0101 tie\u0161saistes biroj\u0101! Mana iepaz\u012b\u0161an\u0101s ar Eiropas Cilv\u0113kties\u012bbu tiesu s\u0101k\u0101s, kad 2000. gadu s\u0101kum\u0101 stud\u0113ju Dj\u016bka Universit\u0101tes Transnacion\u0101lo ties\u012bbu instit\u016bt\u0101 \u017den\u0113vas Universit\u0101t\u0113. P\u0113c atgrie\u0161an\u0101s Krievij\u0101, kur 20. gadsimta devi\u0146desmitajos gados biju ieguvis...","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":208873,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-222791","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222791"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222791\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":230469,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/222791\/revisions\/230469"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/208873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}