{"id":17518,"date":"2014-10-19T23:20:15","date_gmt":"2014-10-19T19:20:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/europeancourt.ru\/?p=17518"},"modified":"2024-06-09T02:02:34","modified_gmt":"2024-06-09T00:02:34","slug":"svezhie-publikacii-po-pravu-ekpch-praktike-espch-na-anglijskom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/2014\/10\/19\/17518\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0421\u0432\u0435\u0436\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0443 \u0415\u041a\u041f\u0427, \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0435 \u0415\u0421\u041f\u0427 \u043d\u0430 \u0430\u043d\u0433\u043b\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u041e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0432 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Enforced Disappearance and\u00a0the European Court of\u00a0Human Rights.\u00a0A\u2018Wall of Silence\u2019, Fact-Finding Difficulties and\u00a0States as \u2018Subversive Objectors\u2019<\/a> by\u00a0Helen Keller and Corina Heri. Journal of International Criminal Justice 12 (2014), pp. 735-750<\/em>.<\/li>\n
  2. Enforced Disappearance and\u00a0the European Court of\u00a0Human Rights\u2019 ratione\u00a0temporis<\/em> Jurisdiction.\u00a0A Discussion of Temporal Elements in Janowiec and\u00a0Others v. Russia<\/a> by\u00a0Corina Heri.\u00a0Journal of International Criminal Justice 12 (2014), pp. 751-768<\/em>.<\/li>\n
  3. Redress for Enforced\u00a0Disappearance.\u00a0Why Financial Compensation is not Enough<\/a> by\u00a0Sarah Fulton.\u00a0Journal of International Criminal Justice 12 (2014), pp. 769-786<\/em>.<\/li>\n
  4. Marriage and same-sex couples. Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. A short guide<\/a>\u00a0by Paul Johnson (\u043e\u0442\u0434\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f)<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u041f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0432 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445, \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 Deepdyve<\/strong> (\u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0430\u0442\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440 \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u0437 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0439\u00a0\u0432 \u0442\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442 \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0434\u044b\u0435 24 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0430\u00a0\u0431\u0435\u0437 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0439, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440 \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 — 20 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u043b\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0437\u0430 5 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0439):<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Margin of appreciation, violation and (in)compatibility: why the ECtHR might consider using an alternative mode of adjudication<\/a> by C. Zoethout.\u00a0European Public Law (vol. 20, no. 2, 2014), pp. 309-330<\/em>.<\/li>\n
    2. Dialogue or disobedience? On the domestic effects of the ECHR in light of the Kamberaj decision<\/a> by G. Bianco and G. Martinico.\u00a0European Public Law (vol. 20, no. 3, 2014), pp. 435-450<\/em>.<\/li>\n
    3. Contemporary aspects of the promotion of democracy by the European Court of Human Rights<\/a> by\u00a0A. Mowbray.\u00a0European Public Law (vol. 20, no. 3, 2014), pp. 469-498<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \u041f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438, \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u043e\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0435 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043d\u0435 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438<\/strong> (\u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0430\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0445 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0432):<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Natural Disasters, Climate Change and Non-Refoulement: What Scope for Resisting Expulsion under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights? by\u00a0Matthew Scott.\u00a0International Journal of Refugee Law<\/a>\u00a0(vol. 26, no. 3, 2014)<\/em>.<\/li>\n
      2. Pornography and the European Convention on Human Rights\u00a0by Paul Johnson. Porn Studies<\/a> (vol. 1, no. 3, 2014), pp.\u00a0315-336<\/em>.<\/li>\n
      3. Deconstructing \u2018legal\u2019 religion in Strasbourg by L.\u00a0Peroni,\u00a0Oxford Journal of Law and Religion<\/a>\u00a0(vol. 3, no. 2, 2014), pp. 235-257<\/em>.<\/li>\n
      4. Holding on to Legalism: The Politics of Russian Litigation on Torture and Discrimination Before the European Court of Human Rights by\u00a0Freek van der Vet. Social and Legal Studies<\/a> (vol. 23 (3), 2014), pp. 361-381<\/em>.<\/li>\n
      5. On Religious and Cultural Equality in European Human Rights Convention Law\u00a0by\u00a0L. Peroni. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights<\/a> (vol. 32, no. 3, 2014)<\/em>.<\/li>\n
      6. The Involvement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Implementation of its Judgments: Recent Developments under Article 46 ECHR by\u00a0L-A. Sicilianos.\u00a0Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights<\/a> (vol. 32, no. 3, 2014)<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        \u041a\u043d\u0438\u0433\u0430<\/strong> Deference in International Courts and Tribunals\u00a0Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation<\/a>\u00a0(\u043d\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u0430)<\/em>. \u0412\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0438:<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. The European Court of Human Rights and standards of proof: An evidential approach toward the margin of appreciation by M\u00f3nika Ambrus.<\/li>\n
        2. Experts in hate speech cases: Towards a higher standard of proof in Strasbourg? by Uladzislau Belavusau.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          \u041e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0432 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445: Enforced Disappearance and\u00a0the European Court of\u00a0Human Rights.\u00a0A\u2018Wall of Silence\u2019, Fact-Finding Difficulties and\u00a0States as \u2018Subversive Objectors\u2019 by\u00a0Helen Keller and Corina Heri. Journal of International Criminal Justice 12 (2014), pp. 735-750....<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":189396,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[150],"tags":[1095,1096],"class_list":["post-17518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-novosti","tag-biblioteka","tag-knigi-i-periodika-na-anglijskom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17518"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17518\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/189396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}