{"id":17843,"date":"2014-11-06T01:35:51","date_gmt":"2014-11-05T21:35:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/europeancourt.ru\/?p=17843"},"modified":"2024-06-09T02:02:45","modified_gmt":"2024-06-09T00:02:45","slug":"publikacii-po-pravu-konvencii-i-praktike-espch-na-anglijskom-noyabr-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/2014\/11\/06\/17843\/","title":{"rendered":"\u041f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0443 \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0435 \u0415\u0421\u041f\u0427 \u043d\u0430 \u0430\u043d\u0433\u043b\u0438\u0439\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c — \u043d\u043e\u044f\u0431\u0440\u044c 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u041e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0432 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Jones v United Kingdom: the European Court of Human Rights restricts individual accountability for torture<\/a> by\u00a0C. Ryngaert. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law (vol. 30, no. 79 (2014) pp. 47-50).<\/em><\/li>\n
  2. The Katy\u0144 Massacre before the European Court of Human Rights: A Personal Account<\/a> by\u00a0Ireneusz C. Kami\u0144ski.\u00a0Polish Yearbook of International Law (vol. 33, 2013).<\/em><\/li>\n
  3. The Case of Janowiec and Others v. Russia: Relinquishment of Jurisdiction in Favour of the Court of History<\/a> by\u00a0Yaroslav Kozheurov.\u00a0Polish Yearbook of International Law (vol. 33, 2013).<\/em><\/li>\n
  4. Do the \u201cUnderlying Values\u201d of the European Convention on Human Rights Begin in 1950?<\/a> by\u00a0William Schabas.\u00a0Polish Yearbook of International Law (vol. 33, 2013).<\/em><\/li>\n
  5. How Could It Go So Wrong? Reformatio in Peius before the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in the Case Janowiec and Others v. Russia<\/a> (or Polish Collective Memory Deceived in Strasbourg) by\u00a0Susana Sanz-Caballero.\u00a0Polish Yearbook of International Law (vol. 33, 2013).<\/em><\/li>\n
  6. Janowiec and Others v. Russia: A Long History of Justice Delayed Turned into a Permanent Case of Justice Denied<\/a> by\u00a0Gabriella Citroni.\u00a0Polish Yearbook of International Law (vol. 33, 2013).<\/em><\/li>\n
  7. Answers to the Questions for the Grand Chamber hearing in the case of Janowiec and Others v. Russia<\/a>.\u00a0Polish Yearbook of International Law (vol. 33, 2013).<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \u041f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f, \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 Deepdyve<\/strong> (\u0431\u0435\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0430\u0442\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0440\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440 \u043b\u044e\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u0438\u0437 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0439\u00a0\u0432 \u0442\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 5 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442 \u043a\u0430\u0436\u0434\u044b\u0435 24 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0430\u00a0\u0431\u0435\u0437 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0439, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440 \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u2014 20 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u043b\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0437\u0430 5 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0439):<\/p>\n

    Asylum hard cases: sexual orientation, female genital mutilation and health in the jurisprudence of national supreme courts and the EctHR<\/a> by\u00a0Christina M. Akrivopoulou and Theodora Roumpou.\u00a0International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies (vol. 2(3), 2014).<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \u041f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438, \u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u043e\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0435 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0438 \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0445 \u043d\u0435 \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438<\/strong> (\u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0430\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0441\u043e\u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0445 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b\u043e\u0432):<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Refugee family reunification rights: a basis in the European Court of Human Rights’ family reunification jurisprudence by\u00a0M. Rohan, Chicago Journal of International Law<\/a>\u00a0(vol. 15, no. 1 (2014) pp. 347-375).<\/em><\/li>\n
    2. Legitimacy and independence of international tribunals: an analysis of the European Court of Human Rights by\u00a0K. Dzehtsiarou and D. Coffey.\u00a0Hastings International and Comparative Law Review<\/a>\u00a0(vol. 37, no. 2 (2014) pp. 271-322).<\/em><\/li>\n
    3. Advisory jurisdiction and the European Court of Human Rights: a magic bullet for dialogue and docket-control? by\u00a0K. Dzehtsiarou and N. O’Meara.\u00a0Legal Studies<\/a>\u00a0(vol. 34, no. 3 (2014) pp. 444-468). <\/em>\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0447\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435: \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0436\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u0430 \u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0437 Deepvyve.<\/li>\n
    4. Jones and Others v. United Kingdom by\u00a0Chim\u00e8ne I. Keitner.\u00a0International Legal Materials<\/a>\u00a0(Vol. 53, no. 3, 2014).\u00a0<\/em><\/li>\n
    5. Suicide in detention in the light of the Human Rights Convention by\u00a0E. Thoonen and W. Duijst.\u00a0New Journal of European Criminal Law<\/a> (vol. 5, no. 2, 2014).<\/em><\/li>\n
    6. Inquisitorial and adversarial expert examinations in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights by\u00a0T. Decaigny.\u00a0New Journal of European Criminal Law<\/a> (vol. 5, no. 2, 2014).<\/em><\/li>\n
    7. Civil asset forfeiture and the presumption of innocence under Article 6(2) ECHR by\u00a0J. Boucht.\u00a0New Journal of European Criminal Law<\/a> (vol. 5, no. 2, 2014).<\/em><\/li>\n
    8. The European Court of Human Rights and domestic violence: Valiuliene v. Lithuania by\u00a0Ronagh J.A. McQuigg.\u00a0International Journal on Human Rights<\/a>.<\/em><\/li>\n
    9. The right to assisted suicide in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights by\u00a0Gregor Puppinck and Claire De La Hougue.\u00a0International Journal on Human Rights<\/a>.<\/em><\/li>\n
    10. Russian NGOs and the European Court of Human Rights: A Spectrum of Approaches to Litigation by\u00a0Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom.\u00a0Human Rights Quarterly<\/a>\u00a0(vol. 36, no. 4).<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      \u041e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0432 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0438\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0438\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u0445: Jones v United Kingdom: the European Court of Human Rights restricts individual accountability for torture by\u00a0C. Ryngaert. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law (vol. 30, no. 79 (2014)...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":189370,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[150],"tags":[1095,1096],"class_list":["post-17843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-novosti","tag-biblioteka","tag-knigi-i-periodika-na-anglijskom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17843"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17843\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/189370"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/europeancourt.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}